The stark contrast between Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Will Happer says a great deal about the state of the climate change debate. It is radical versus reason.
BY TODD ROYAL: Blaming climate change for California fires is a canard that doesn’t look at the complete incompetence of elected officials, environmental regulations and organizations that stand to profit from the GWCC narrative.
Does anyone truly believe that had we only foregone modern transportation and electricity, one less walrus would have fallen from that cliff?
There is nothing coincidental about common déjà vu features of a CO2 climate crisis-premised war on fossil fuels and a hysterically-hyped sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission acid rain environmental calamity a half-century ago.
The year 2020 is shaping up to be one of madness when it comes to the climate change debate. Several huge milestones are in the cards and these cards are on the table.
To quote the top comment from a fan on the Yankees’ Facebook post about this UN publicity stunt, “play baseball, not politics.”
When only one side of a scientific debate is consistently presented, it’s no longer teaching. It’s brainwashing.
The Trump White House plans to convene a National Security Council review panel headed by Princeton emeritus professor of physics Dr. Will Happer and global warming campaigners are terrified. What are they afraid of?
A number of federal agencies either maintain or fund websites that specifically exist to push climate alarmist teaching materials.
The children being used as global warming propaganda props don't know what they don't know about the climate.
The news media recently promoted a ‘scare of the day’ that global warming is negatively impacting commercial fishermen and reducing global fish production. Objective data obliterate that claim.
“60 Minutes” used to be known for hard-hitting journalism. But when it comes to climate change alarmism, the news magazine show becomes a promoter of the cause. On March 3, 2019, Steve Kroft lobbed softball after softball to his interviewees without even bothering to engage in critical examination. What would Andy Rooney think?
President Trump is preparing to establish a climate security commission. Warming campaigners want to shut it down. They want to upend and transform America, but demand No Debate on underlying “science.”
America needs the PCCS and Dr. Happer is the qualified adult in the room to head it up.
Why do global warming proponents fear inquiry?