Will Antarctica's 'Doomsday Glacier' meet its doom within 3 years?
We will describe the impacts of forces you have heard of, but do not really understand.
The UN released a new climate report and it tells whoppers!
Why are they demonizing clean-burning natural gas?
NASA / NOAA's energy budget fails to pass review.
Too many scientists and laypeople accept the NASA/NOAA climate change models without question, as well as 100 others financed by our government at academic institutions. Their Earth's Energy Budget have become articles of doctrine and religious fervor. Yet other scientists, who adhere to the scientific methods, attempt to explain that fundamental physics does not support this doctrine, nor does thermodynamics, atmospheric dynamics, or atomic physics, etc. Can this gap ever be reconciled? Can public policy decisions be shaped that satisfy everybody's desire for a clean, sustainable environment without bankrupting the economy and destroying our social structures and values? This two-part essay [...]
Climate modelers ignore a heat source tens of miles below us while only considering the source millions of miles above.
Factoring nature back in.
Global warming campaigners attribute too much to CO2 emissions and not enough to nature.
Activists grossly distort the human impact on sea level.
We will continue to experience climate change no matter what people do.
We need better and more reliable information to decide what actions we should consider preparing for climate changes.
Can you understand climate without knowing?
Weather is a never-ending multi-level show of physics trying to overcome imbalances and irregularities too numerous to quantify accurately. Yet, we try hour after hour and day after day all across the Earth.
Weather is nothing more and nothing less than nature trying to equilibrate the balance of all energy transmitted to the Earth by the Sun.