Too many scientists and laypeople accept the NASA/NOAA climate change models without question, as well as 100 others financed by our government at academic institutions. Their Earth's Energy Budget have become articles of doctrine and religious fervor. Yet other scientists, who adhere to the scientific methods, attempt to explain that fundamental physics does not support this doctrine, nor does thermodynamics, atmospheric dynamics, or atomic physics, etc. Can this gap ever be reconciled? Can public policy decisions be shaped that satisfy everybody's desire for a clean, sustainable environment without bankrupting the economy and destroying our social structures and values? This two-part essay [...]