From Canada's Friends of Science: Hansen’s argument is that the tax has to be high enough that people will buy into the carbon dividend (rebate to lower income households).
For scientific analysis to have validity it must be transparent. Read CFACT's official comments and SUBMIT YOURS NOW.
The Left, while actively demanding obedience to politicized science, at the same time wholesale rejects solid science that is essential to sustaining and advancing. Real scientists don't censor.
Manmade climate crisis promoters reject history and evidence of natural climate change
Fred Singer was warm, good humored, kind, and spunky … but he was also deeply intelligent and wise. He would no doubt want us to carry on his fight, and that we intend to do.
Dyson was famously counted among the world's most respected skeptical scientists on climate change.
Cooking the books and scaring people.
Gavin Schmidt’s spat with Steve Koonin underscores why we need to debate climate change.
Why do global warming proponents fear inquiry?
Team warming is apoplectic at the very thought that a group of scientists might examine its cherished claims.
Courts should bar evidence that fails to meet basic standards of honesty, integrity and credibility.
By Dr. Jeffrey Foss "What can I do to correct these crazy, super wrong errors?”
“The bottom line of the real fire data produced by the State of California and in the peer-reviewed literature is clear: there has been no upward trend in the number of wildfires in California during the past decades,” Mass wrote on his blog. “In fact, the frequency of fires has declined,” he wrote. “And in most of the state, there has not been an increasing trend in area burned during the past several decades.”
Science is the enemy of global warming alarmists. And objective scientific data is that enemy on steroids. Let’s take a look at what the scientific data reveal about summer warmth.
When only a third of peer-reviewed studies reach the same results when they are replicated by outside authors, this is a serious problem.