Gavin Schmidt’s spat with Steve Koonin underscores why we need to debate climate change.
Why do global warming proponents fear inquiry?
Team warming is apoplectic at the very thought that a group of scientists might examine its cherished claims.
Courts should bar evidence that fails to meet basic standards of honesty, integrity and credibility.
By Dr. Jeffrey Foss "What can I do to correct these crazy, super wrong errors?”
“The bottom line of the real fire data produced by the State of California and in the peer-reviewed literature is clear: there has been no upward trend in the number of wildfires in California during the past decades,” Mass wrote on his blog. “In fact, the frequency of fires has declined,” he wrote. “And in most of the state, there has not been an increasing trend in area burned during the past several decades.”
Science is the enemy of global warming alarmists. And objective scientific data is that enemy on steroids. Let’s take a look at what the scientific data reveal about summer warmth.
When only a third of peer-reviewed studies reach the same results when they are replicated by outside authors, this is a serious problem.
The Green attack on genetically improved crops is deeply unscientific and hurts the environment, the poor and everyone.
Many research results published in scientific journals shouldn’t be trusted.
Don't confuse speculative conclusions drawn about climate science with the science itself.
I wondered "How many skeptical videos are there?" and set out to find out.
A new lesson set called the Climate Change IQ (CCIQ) provides a good skeptical critique of ten top alarmist claims.
These reports are supposedly summarizing the existing scientific literature, but in reality the merely choose and use scholarly citations to support the one-sided argument for alarmism.
CFACT policy advisor Larry Bell lauds the first steps taken by the Trump Administration to restore NASA to its primary mission -- and encourages that the agency needs to press on with a mission to Mars.