Here’s your chance to demand EPA ensure transparent, open, non-ideology-driven science.
Feel free to share your comments on scientific integrity at EPA here in the comments.
Feel free to share your comments on scientific integrity at EPA here in the comments.
The main thing we learn from this paper is how easy it is to get money to study climate inanities.
Although urban areas account for less than 4% of the global land surface, they contain many of the weather stations where temperatures are collected which substantially skew the bigger record picture.
We should demand objectivity, rigor and honesty.
There is strong evidence that the PM2.5 standards cannot be justified on scientific, economic, or human health grounds;
It’s just another climate "denier" with a Nobel Prize in Physics…
Lots of things in the world fit the math of chaos and they are said to be chaotic.
On Tuesday, we lost another friend. CFACT's friends and readers have been treated to a brilliant weekly science update from Jay who was a first class scientist and amazing athlete.
“Our schools are failing to educate students to be prepared for undergraduate science education – while also teaching them that political conformity is the essence of science.”
Watch: Morano on OAN TV: Talks about Paul Ehrlich’s claim ‘If I’m always wrong, so is science’ claim – & the NYT seeking shorter people and racist science.
BY ART GOPALAN: Carbon dioxide is one of the essential molecules for life on our Earth.
This is about a highly nonlinear information flow that I call an issue storm, which I discovered about 40 years ago but never wrote about because I was making lots of money knowing about it.
Correlation and causation are not the same.
The global warming movement has damaged scientific integrity. Can we get it back?
This technological rule of threes is seen over and over in history.